| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 27 '21 at 02:27 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
78% 140 Pts
|
62% 464 Pts
|
28% 461 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
55.9%
Above average
|
61% 79.8 fps
|
46% 58.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 392 296 236 193 186 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
92% 408 MB/s
|
178% 60.1 MB/s
|
259% 355 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
832GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 203 205 203 205 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
116% 158 MB/s
|
156% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
105%
Outstanding
|
109% 38.2 GB/s
|
93% 32.5 GB/s
|
50% 80.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 55: 7R 4G 8B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55% | 18% | 105 | 335 | 267 | 60 | 26" | 1920 1080 | XXX0000 AAA |
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,865 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 535x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 479x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 389x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 228x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 223x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $305 |