Asrock B365M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 23:22
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 210
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 744
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 123
Parallax 131
114% 131 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 107
Splatting 88.2
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
ASRock(1849 3E92) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.87 fps
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.3
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 375 374 368 367 334 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 2049
Mixed 1,532
SusWrite 407
362% 1,631 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 89.3
301% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 1,271
DQ Mixed 1,165
872% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 270%
Great: 302%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
329GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 415 432 441 442 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 105
Mixed 349
SusWrite 428
63% 278 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.3
171% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 224
194% 284 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 9TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 568 543 543 559 528 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 532
Write 214
Mixed 114
SusWrite 535
252% 349 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.7
376% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 306%
Great: 310%
WD easystore 264D 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 191 188 187 186 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 196
Mixed 137
SusWrite 188
240% 177 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.3
368% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 4.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-20-20 D4-3200 8A45 CL16-18-18 D4-3200 8A45 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 8A45 CL16-18-18 D4-3200 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 28.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 338 294 60 24.5" 1920 1080 ACR0624 XF251Q
Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback