Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LU
Memory	19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AZE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 115 2-Core 232 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 525 56% 444 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 18DF) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 80 Parallax 34.3 36% 52.8 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 52.3 Splatting 0.3 16% 21.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 52 58 61 112 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 391 Write 323 Mixed 326 SusWrite 118 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 1.1 44% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 2.9 27% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 100%
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 33,645 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 346GB free Firmware: P6MA001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 1070 1056 1010 1077 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 1,038 Write 1,064 Mixed 980 SusWrite 895 224% 994 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 73.2 250% 85.9 MB/s	DQ Read 610 DQ Write 832 DQ Mixed 262 326% 568 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 0443 RMSA3330MJ78HBF-3200 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.3% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.6 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 23.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU

CPU
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	549x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	425x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	3x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	490x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	487x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	510x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	141x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TBBench 219%, 6,851 samples	86x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	198x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	132x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	96x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16