HP Pavilion Laptop 14-dv0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 14-dv0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C9
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 05:32
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 144
58% 98 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 380
34% 287 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 14.1
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 11.2
11% 14 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSK HE-C325 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 260 250 269 275 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 287
Write 299
Mixed 270
SusWrite 263
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 23.6
81% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 156
110% 142 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V-Color Inc TN416G26D819-SB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 15.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1400
Typical Pavilion Laptop 14-dv0xxx Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 14-dv0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback