HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3624
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 01:45
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 39
2-Core 72.3
41% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 75.5
8-Core 74.2
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 74.3
5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
HP(103C 3624) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 8
Parallax 2.5
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 5.5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 177 188 180 199 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 244
Write 224
Mixed 211
SusWrite 186
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 18
67% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 52.4
57% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 81%
Generic SC200 SD Card 197GB
39GB free
Firmware: 8.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.4 8.5 9.4 9.2 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 6
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 8.9
7% 9.08 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.2
618% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 33%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
137GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 17.2
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 21%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
106GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 2.5
25% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
SDXC Card 64GB
9GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 25 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 24.4
Mixed 27
SusWrite 23.6
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.2
241% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 41%
SDXC Card 128GB
84GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 26.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 18.2
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
161% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair VS4GSDS800D2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD01DD
Typical Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback