Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 10:10
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 26,507 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 145 2-Core 284 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 796 81% 653 Pts	64-Core 1,100 68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 1E21) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Lighting 96.6 Reflection 93.8 Parallax 94.6 79% 95 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 85.9 Splatting 83.9 75% 92.6 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 805 94 168 104 104 103 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1430 Write 1,539 Mixed 1,066 SusWrite 230 238% 1,066 MB/s	4K Read 55.8 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 72.1 258% 93.6 MB/s	DQ Read 636 DQ Write 856 DQ Mixed 269 336% 587 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 255%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 154GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 61 54 64 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 30.9 Write 1.7 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 56.3 27% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 33.2 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 37.3 SC Mixed 21.8 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	7	5	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	154x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	29x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	101x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	82x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	34x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	26x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	24x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	52x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	36x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16