PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 30GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 23.9 GB free of 30 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101223 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 25 '21 at 02:55 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
118%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 24 16 24 31 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
142GB free
Firmware: 100.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 111 113 113 114 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 157 167 164 163 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
Lexar SFF-SSD 512GB
388GB free, PID ba12
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 115 115 115 116 MB/s
|
144%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 115 118 117 119 MB/s
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 30GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
|
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 144 | 34" | 1280 720 | LEN66A1 LEN G34w-10 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 629x |
Core i7 930Intel $149Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 407x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 218x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 149x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 106x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |