MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 242%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$363
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 322
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,212
109% 920 Pts
64-Core 2,658
164% 2,658 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6905) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 263
Reflection 260
Parallax 538
214% 354 fps
MRender 400
Gravity 202
Splatting 299
244% 300 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 200%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Firecuda 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2285 2484 1118 984 993 987 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 271%
Amd-raid Array 4 480GB
893GB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 512 511 445 484 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 224
Write 133
Mixed 158
SusWrite 449
55% 241 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 15
59% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 24.8
21% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 246%
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2652 2695 2680 2696 2690 2690 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 1,756
Write 2722
Mixed 1,730
SusWrite 2,684
505% 2,223 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 73
241% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 1,190
DQ Mixed 810
640% 868 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 349%
Great: 654%
Amd-raid Array 7 1TB
323GB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2518 332 225 252 329 234 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
241% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 2,718
Mixed 1,734
SusWrite 648
398% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 75.8
251% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 1,421
DQ Mixed 800
671% 942 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 241%
Great: 241%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 195 199 171 189 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 168
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 173
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.3
441% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 201 206 174 195 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 159
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 176
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
444% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 110%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 59.8
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 45.4
143% 49.9 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 43.5
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix AG32CQ
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback