Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 10:24
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 197 66% 121 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 546 52% 431 Pts	64-Core 527 33% 527 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 95.2 Parallax 25 15% 46.2 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 20.3 Splatting 13.5 12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTF 512GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 959 888 981 983 928 883 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,031 Write 1,003 Mixed 972 SusWrite 937 222% 986 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 49.1 158% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 463 DQ Write 765 DQ Mixed 631 474% 620 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 178%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 728GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 97 99 100 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 141 Write 145 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 100 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.6 250% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B 2x16GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.7% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 25.9 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 21.7 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 44: 5R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
44%	29%	55	99	5	120	15.5"	1536 864	NCP0036

History: Score 35: 5R 1G 7B | Score 44: 5R 4G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	624x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	73x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	378x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	278x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	41x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	376x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	124x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	63x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	206x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	130x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	79x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16