HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 14:17
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 513
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 40
Parallax 38
29% 38 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 26.9
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 167 40 40 49 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 427
Write 298
Mixed 292
SusWrite 102
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 27.7
92% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 114
90% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
362GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 129 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 127
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 3% 65 70 57 60 23" 1280 720 ENC2394 EV2316W
History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 12: 1R 1G 4B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback