Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 70 1-Core 121 2-Core 236 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 424 55% 413 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 18.4 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 16.8 14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 129 24 43 20 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 311 Write 123 Mixed 164 SusWrite 54 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 22.4 88% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 52.4 DQ Mixed 22.3 38% 76 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 85%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 243GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 145 151 150 147 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 147 Write 149 Mixed 106 SusWrite 149 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-082.A00G 9905702-120.A00G 16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 17.6 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 41: 4R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
41%	48%	31	75	6	60	23.1"	1920 1080	GSM580C IPS236

History: Score 31: 3R 4G 4B | Score 41: 4R 5G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $387

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $508	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16