Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GD
Memory	16 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 09:42
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 93 2-Core 236 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 461 53% 415 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 2,418 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 12FF) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.2 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 20.1 18% 24.4 fps	MRender 17.2 Gravity 27.7 Splatting 20.3 18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 512GB 4,212 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 340 346 353 349 349 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 393 Write 323 Mixed 333 SusWrite 347 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 42.2 120% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 265 214% 303 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 121%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 818GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 127 129 129 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 142 Write 144 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 127 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.6 240% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 20GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 21 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD0563

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	154x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	101x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	63x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	180x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 24%, 2,418 samples	138x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	171x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	46x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	6x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	105x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 63%, 849 samples	44x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 928 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16