Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 120
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 170
27% 192 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 6.3
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 52 39 68 39 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 338
Write 304
Mixed 281
SusWrite 58.2
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 5.6
94% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 81.1
97% 168 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 228%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
819GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 92 91 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 93.5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 91.1
51% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S1MB-4 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0672
Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback