Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 23:25
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 300
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,090
100% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 866E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 111
Parallax 129
110% 125 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2120 1978 1719 1399 989 1016 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2179
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 1,537
423% 1,890 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58.6
211% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 408
334% 488 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 284%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
460GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 399 424 426 439 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 466
Mixed 388
SusWrite 430
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 53.6
177% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
125GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 402 417 411 429 427 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 502
Write 482
Mixed 420
SusWrite 422
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 52
176% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB
156GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 401 427 430 442 447 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 497
Write 465
Mixed 389
SusWrite 432
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 45.5
153% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB
760GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2265 2134 1148 1153 1156 1138 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,459
Write 2264
Mixed 1,507
SusWrite 1,499
433% 1,932 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 75.2
241% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 969
717% 950 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 307%
Great: 384%
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB
33GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 259 144 110 71 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 424
SusWrite 180
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 50.2
162% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 117%
Kingston SUV400S37240G 480GB
348GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 380 396 393 409 414 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 506
Write 409
Mixed 386
SusWrite 339
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 25.8
115% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 35.5
91% 188 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 66%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
477GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1147 1150 1150 1148 1149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,297
Write 1118
Mixed 717
SusWrite 1,149
240% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 54.3
179% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 480
422% 649 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 210%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 DEL40C1 DELL UP3216Q
Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $874
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback