HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8399
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 22:39
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 69
1-Core 100
2-Core 188
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 539
55% 447 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 31.5
26% 31.9 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 22.3
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 419 423 155 110 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 489
Write 419
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 264
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 14.1
80% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 1.1
61% 143 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 92%
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB
439GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 33 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 23.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 31.7
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 19%
MAXTOR S TM3250310AS 250GB
169GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 33
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 33.7
45% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 30.1
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 5R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 32% 34 304 228 60 27" 1920 1080 HWP3325 HP 27es
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 17: 1R 2G 6B | Score 43: 5R 6G 0B
Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback