Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 12:32
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 120
57% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 369
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 364
24% 364 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$220
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 78.4
43% 65.1 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 47
51% 59 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$97
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 308 315 315 313 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 330
Write 318
Mixed 276
SusWrite 306
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 25.2
83% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 43.9
35% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 130%
Samsung 830 64GB
30GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 133 143 136 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 341
Write 130
Mixed 159
SusWrite 136
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 17.5
69% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 42.8
DQ Mixed 20.1
19% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 14.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 50: 10R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 42% 24 299 216 60 7.2" 1360 768 SAM0530 SAMSUNG
History: Score 29: 4R 3G 0B | Score 50: 10R 0G 0B
Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 1,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $590
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $360Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback