Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 12:36
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 138
58% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 334
33% 268 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.6% Average
Lighting 53.2
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 78.4
43% 65.3 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 47
47% 59.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 330 329 331 330 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 367
Write 305
Mixed 279
SusWrite 326
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 31.7
98% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 45.8
39% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 830 64GB
30GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 135 136 131 147 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 352
Write 126
Mixed 147
SusWrite 138
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 16.5
67% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 20
19% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0530 SAMSUNG
Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback