Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '17 at 09:07
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 96.2
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 140
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 353
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2771) 3GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 28
Parallax 48.8
30% 38 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 35
27% 32.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 174
Write 93.4
Mixed 114
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 15.7
64% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 34.2
DQ Mixed 15
16% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
874GB free
Firmware: 05.01D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 116
Mixed 112
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.37
121% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
251GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 114
Write 86.7
Mixed 110
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.32
106% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
53GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 59
Write 54.7
Mixed 54.4
42% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 41%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
35GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 109
Write 82.5
Mixed 86
70% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.44
111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
4GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 56.8
Mixed 58.5
45% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.25
94% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback