HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8393
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 148 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 347 38% 297 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% HP(103C 8393) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 49.8 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 54 41% 55.7 fps	MRender 51.2 Gravity 49 Splatting 54.6 43% 51.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 23,829 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 122 117 121 97 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 852 Write 380 Mixed 214 SusWrite 122 86% 392 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 32.3 93% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 449 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 117 145% 263 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 141%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 619GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 119 118 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 128 Write 113 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 117 70% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 75%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 13GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 86.8 Write 47.1 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 46.9 71% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 87% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 20.7 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 49: 6R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
49%	22%	60	264	166	120	17.2"	1920 1080	AUO149D

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 47: 5R 6G 4B | Score 49: 6R 6G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,248x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	196x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	323x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	301x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	262x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	75x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	66x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	144x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	77x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16