Asus M5A78L-M LX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX V2  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 19:44
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 107
54% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 333
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 63.2
51% 65.1 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 54.6
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 119 126 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 123
Write 133
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 123
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 75%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
133GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 61 61 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 62.3
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 60.3
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
505GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 12 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 25
Mixed 21
SusWrite 13.5
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 1TB
51GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 14 14 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 25.7
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 13.3
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 43%
SMI USB DISK 3.1 64GB
59GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 7.3 12 5.8 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 26.8
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 7.4
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.2
140% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX V2 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback