Sicomputer S200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSicomputer S200  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z11PA-D8 Series
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 16:59
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 97
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 710
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 2,671
165% 2,671 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel RS3DC040 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 153 156 148 157 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 1TB
732GB free
Firmware: 1085
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 39.9
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 38.7
9% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 9.8
29% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 13%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-083.E00G 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 15.7
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback