Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '17 at 02:22
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 223 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 744 73% 599 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1467 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.80 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 59.8 48% 62.8 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 57.5 Splatting 55 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 2,758 Write 1,154 Mixed 1,292 380% 1,734 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 22.9 142% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 21.1 50% 105 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 236%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 48GB free Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20268 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 84 84 499 (AE) Unknown 100 100 110 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 55 193274970139 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6283 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 84 84 16 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 65441885605 (F7) Unknown 100 100 2061778003 (F8) Unknown 100 100 100486091833
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 48GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 38285 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 930 (B1) Unknown 95 95 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 47 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2606 (EB) Unknown 99 99 234 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23685887346
Poor: 51% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 339GB free Firmware: JKAOA3FD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 108 (03) Spinup time 147 147 51571786220 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 230 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 47480 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 211 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 312 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 312 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 227634708513 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2	43% Average	Read 86.3 Write 63.5 Mixed 66.4 54% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.34 89% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 68%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB 12,976 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 309GB free Firmware: 77.04D77 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 194 193 6266 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1051 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29902 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 941 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 258 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 940361 (C2) HDA temperature 120 90 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.6% Average	Read 91.7 Write 81 Mixed 82.5 64% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.25 76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 253GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 194 176 3291 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 638 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35753 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 427 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 252 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 385 (C2) HDA temperature 115 86 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 11 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	38.7% Below average	Read 64.9 Write 69.9 Mixed 83.8 55% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL15-17-17 D4-3000 2x8GB 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 32.8 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 26.4 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	196x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)