Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 485 39% 340 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 8305) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.76% Terrible	Lighting 10.9 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 4 9% 8.93 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 4.5 6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.76% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK480MBP-1A 480GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: M511 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 320 306 317 301 308 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 311 Write 326 Mixed 269 SusWrite 308 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 33.3 116% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 202 165% 233 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-TF 4x4GB 395 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 31.1 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 21.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	113x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	102x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	98x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	150x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	118x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	62x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	50x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	33x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	33x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	46x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	38x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 61%, 375 samples	34x

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $509