Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 22:02
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 560
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 86.2
47% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 91.1
8-Core 90.6
12% 90.8 Pts
64-Core 91.9
6% 91.9 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.1
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.8
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS120G2G0A-00JH 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8381c75
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 28 30 37 35 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 6.3
Mixed 22
SusWrite 29.1
11% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 3.4
583% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
395GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 91 100 107 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 56
SusWrite 100
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-S2P Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback