MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 20:30
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$295
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 296
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,062
100% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,578
98% 1,578 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 254
Parallax 322
238% 289 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 237
Splatting 173
189% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 715 794 832 823 813 789 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,350
Write 2,116
Mixed 1,682
SusWrite 794
388% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 86.6
285% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 978
721% 954 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 273%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
146GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 468 468 471 404 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 443
Mixed 412
SusWrite 443
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 57.2
187% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 120%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 307 306 306 306 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 445
Mixed 395
SusWrite 324
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 52
172% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 353
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
269GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 468 468 471 466 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 447
Mixed 411
SusWrite 468
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 57.8
188% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 33.3
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 32.1
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 27" 1280 720 SAM0F58 C27JG5x
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 14,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $829
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback