PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 13.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120629 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 19 '21 at 19:12 |
Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 64% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Sapphire(174B 2438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 11 32 24 19 20 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
125GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 66 66 65 66 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL7-7-7 DDR3-1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
46.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41% | 42% | 40 | 245 | 144 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | BNQ78B7 BenQ G2255 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 99x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 41x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $522 |