Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 18:15
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 154
2-Core 305
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 822
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 276
Parallax 503
204% 343 fps
MRender 375
Gravity 208
Splatting 314
245% 299 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 194%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,969
Write 1,214
Mixed 1,053
311% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 80.1
276% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 1,021
794% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
151GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 367 366 364 363 371 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 512
Write 366
Mixed 333
SusWrite 366
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 24
111% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 194
174% 262 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
212GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1553 1253 1260 1261 1258 1253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 2,428
Mixed 1,764
SusWrite 1,306
449% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 91.6
304% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,289
DQ Write 1,140
DQ Mixed 1,206
907% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 329%
Great: 372%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
463GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 80 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 77.6
Write 74.7
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 78.1
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
37GB free
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 95
Mixed 50
SusWrite 96.8
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 37.4
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 33.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 1 120 27" 1280 720 ACI27B1 ROG PG278Q
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback