Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 157
2-Core 315
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 856
91% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,165
72% 1,165 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 252
Parallax 443
1% 232 fps
MRender 375
Gravity 197
Splatting 286
233% 286 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,013
Write 1,226
Mixed 1,037
314% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 81.9
283% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 1,079
DQ Mixed 1,068
828% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
173GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 368 367 369 369 369 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 368
Mixed 324
SusWrite 368
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 42
149% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 196
177% 266 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
212GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 1261 1253 1255 1251 1253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 2,397
Mixed 1,850
SusWrite 1,305
453% 2,020 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 93.5
317% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 1,171
DQ Mixed 1,233
929% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 335%
Great: 372%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
467GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 83.2
Write 70.2
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 73
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
42GB free
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 95.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 97.2
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 36.7
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 35.5
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 120 27" 1280 720 ACI27B1 ROG PG278Q
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback