Asus FX503VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus FX503VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX503VD
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 13:46
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 384
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 0.1
4% 12.6 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 9.6 2.2 13 87 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 394
Write 266
Mixed 270
SusWrite 57.4
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 8.5
44% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 43.8
48% 81 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
163GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 82 84 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 63.2
Write 60.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 80
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 750GB
98GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 59 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 67.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 59
80% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 10R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
63% 33% 45 240 150 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO61ED
History: Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 63: 10R 4G 1B
Typical FX503VD Builds (Compare 1,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus FX503VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback