Asus FX503VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus FX503VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX503VD
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 199
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 391
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 6.81
6% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 6
Splatting 14.3
8% 9.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 42 21 1.3 29 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 374
Write 278
Mixed 211
SusWrite 78
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 3.7
29% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 35.3
42% 75 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 55%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
92GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 59 60 77 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 95.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 64.9
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX503VD Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus FX503VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback