Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 14:09
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 642
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 122 85 133 58 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 464
Write 167
Mixed 329
SusWrite 143
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 36.7
143% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 184
160% 236 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 94%
ESA3SMD2PSPB240GB 240GB
122GB free
Firmware: P1111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 316 314 312 316 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 494
Write 316
Mixed 295
SusWrite 315
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 29.6
104% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 183
148% 205 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 80%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
180GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 69 68 71 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 53.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 68.6
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 34.1
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 29.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 6R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 43% 46 151 89 75 0" 1920 1080
History: Score 23: 3R 2G 2B | Score 52: 6R 5G 7B | Score 58: 6R 7G 7B
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback