Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 08:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 21
2-Core 69.6
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 179
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 1.4
1% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 87 99 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 276
Write 116
Mixed 164
SusWrite 93.1
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 25.5
86% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 95.6
74% 100 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 73%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
931GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 111 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 105
Write 71.2
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 109
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback