Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 322
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,126
104% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,585
98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (166 fps cap detected)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 166
Parallax 166
135% 166 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 166
Splatting 166
136% 166 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 128%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme GIGABYTE GP-ASM2 1TB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1460 923 903 863 910 895 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,616
Write 2,286
Mixed 1,803
SusWrite 992
378% 1,674 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.7
196% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 1,600
DQ Mixed 1,248
968% 1,304 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 245%
Great: 467%
NT-2TB 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 460 465 465 462 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 475
Mixed 335
SusWrite 465
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 48.1
143% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 270
192% 250 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Generic- Compact Flash 16GB
12GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 9.4
Mixed 2
SusWrite 16.9
15% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.5
167% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 16%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
305GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 113 113 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47% Average
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 112
132% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0490 XB271HU
Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback