Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 05:06
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 849
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 979
61% 979 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2730 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 170
Parallax 159
123% 160 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 157
Splatting 115
108% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1732 1789 1755 1361 1318 1094 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,367
Write 2,328
Mixed 1,206
SusWrite 1508
415% 1,852 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 60.6
218% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 920
700% 953 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 297%
Great: 526%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
77GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 426 354 409 402 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,000
Write 780
Mixed 774
SusWrite 415
218% 992 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 67.2
228% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 841
652% 906 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 218%
Great: 353%
Lio-org FILEIO 1TB
661GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 100 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 98.7
Write 82.3
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 96.7
19% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 11.1
39% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 32.2
30% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 23%
OCZ-VERT EX3 120GB
12GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.2% Very good
Read 39.8
Write 42
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 37.4
55% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 14.1
1,171% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 20.2
DQ Mixed 15.2
1,253% 16.2 MB/s
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 40.8
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 4.8
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB
3203, 3203, 3203, 3203 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 29.5
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 29.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 110 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback