Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 00:46
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 818
86% 687 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 127
69% 93.7 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 42.9
53% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2583 1058 944 906 878 888 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,994
Write 2,132
Mixed 2631
SusWrite 1,209
501% 2,242 MB/s
4K Read 70.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 83
286% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 674
506% 681 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 313%
Great: 494%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB
190GB free
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 572 161 62 104 167 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,176
Write 636
Mixed 545
SusWrite 210
142% 642 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 30.7
103% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 324
244% 326 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 106%
Great: 330%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 416 416 414 415 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 497
Write 409
Mixed 389
SusWrite 417
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 25.7
121% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 88.5
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 95.5
84% 121 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: 03150010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 204 61 63 61 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 473
Write 330
Mixed 313
SusWrite 130
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 39
132% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 122
97% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
3.5TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 192 195 194 194 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 189
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 193
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 153 153 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 139
Write 150
Mixed 69
SusWrite 152
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 42.3
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 39.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 105%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 24" 1280 720 SAM07B5 SMT24A550
Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,063
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback