Lenovo 20U2S37M00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20U2S37M00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20U2S37M00
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 22:08
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 54%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 22.4
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 186
48% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 331
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 507C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt512g TOSHIBA MEMORY 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 712 456 359 332 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 721
Write 702
Mixed 697
SusWrite 495
147% 654 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 28.4
86% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 585
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 327
295% 452 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 215%
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.7
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
7% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 304
13% 304 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 14" 1280 701 LEN40A9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback