Disguise rx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDisguise rx  (all builds)
Motherboarddisguise rx
Memory42 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 18:31
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 230
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 903
78% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,213
75% 1,213 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 12BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 222
Parallax 244
184% 230 fps
MRender 296
Gravity 241
Splatting 195
194% 244 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 170%
Great: 173%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60pnv2t04 TOSHIBA 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AHGA4103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2146 1669 1596 1573 1566 1576 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 2,193
Mixed 1,603
SusWrite 1,688
423% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 82.4
286% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 921
688% 916 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 314%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ATP A4B08QD8BNTDSE 6x8GB
6 of 24 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 32.7
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 18.9" 1280 720 DELF00E DELL E1909W
Typical rx Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO

System: Disguise rx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback