Asrock 890FX Deluxe4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 890FX Deluxe4  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101123
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '21 at 17:25
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 56
32% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 145
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 13.6
11% 15.1 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 106 111 111 112 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 328
Write 190
Mixed 207
SusWrite 106
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 16.3
55% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 89.1
DQ Mixed 39
36% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST1500DL001-9VT15L 1.5TB
400GB free
Firmware: CC92
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 106 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 106
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 107
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 114 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 29
SusWrite 114
118% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 14% 29 40 17 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
Typical 890FX Deluxe4 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 890FX Deluxe4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $416
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback