Acer Aspire A315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Venusaur_KL
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 12:24
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 206
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 294
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1191) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 448
Write 80.4
Mixed 110
SusWrite 74.9
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 16.9
78% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 73.9
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 82.2
60% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 128%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 122 122 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 71.5
Write 104
Mixed 72
SusWrite 122
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 HWP327A HP E232
Typical Aspire A315-51 Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback