Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120719
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 174 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 336 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 18.4 14% 18.1 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 55 60 56 70 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 450 Write 80.9 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 60.5 35% 164 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 1.7 46% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 55.8 DQ Mixed 1.7 27% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 232GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 226 227 226 237 235 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.8% Good	Read 251 Write 232 Mixed 236 SusWrite 223 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 35.5 116% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 466GB free Firmware: MS1OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 191 190 190 192 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 183 Mixed 36 SusWrite 187 107% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 103%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 225GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 15 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 21 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 15.5 30% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%
Innostor Innostor 32GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	9.37% Terrible	Read 32.2 Write 20.3 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 14 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 23% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.37% Great: 29%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 19GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 15.2 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 10.1 24% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.4 174% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 4x2GB 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.5"	1280 701	PHLC084 Philips 247EL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P900 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	84x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	66x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	39x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	18x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $29Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 88 samples	9x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 PSD34G1600L81 PSD34G1600L81 12GBSamsungBench 37%, 7 samples	5x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16