Dell XPS 8940

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8940  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KV3RP
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 05:51
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 147
2-Core 290
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 960
91% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Dell(1028 375D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 84.6
76% 90.2 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 84.3
Splatting 71.7
67% 83.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bc511 NVMe SK hynix 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11004101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 218 233 130 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,003
Write 985
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 172
180% 801 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 64
212% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 448
408% 626 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 149%
Great: 194%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
46GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 51 50 51 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 52.6
Write 50.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 49.8
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
109GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 112 113 113 115 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 113
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 111
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
28GB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 74.1
Write 59.9
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 70.7
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 66%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
23GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 73 75 75 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 58
Write 69.1
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 67
83% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.6" 1280 720 BNQ785A BenQG2222HDL
Typical XPS 8940 Builds (Compare 10,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO

System: Dell XPS 8940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback