Lenovo 81Q4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81Q4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 622
60% 494 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 96.5
Parallax 89.4
71% 90.9 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 78.7
76% 95.5 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20290001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 571 506 525 493 560 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 671
Write 658
Mixed 597
SusWrite 526
138% 613 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.5
198% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 831
622% 831 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 158%
Great: 200%
Hitachi HCC545050A7E630 500GB
282GB free
Firmware: GR2OA310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 83 82 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 96.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 80.4
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 27
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 4R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 36% 53 331 261 60 17.3" 1920 1080 BOE0838
History: Score 28: 4R 1G 5B | Score 48: 5R 5G 8B | Score 47: 4R 6G 9B
Typical 81Q4 Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81Q4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback