Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '17 at 01:14
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 160 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 492 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 18.5 16% 17.7 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 20.5 16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFZ10.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3299 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1819 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 187 187 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1455 (C2) HDA temperature 68 50 214749347872 (F1) Unknown 100 100 153020	73% Very good	Read 428 Write 340 Mixed 374 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 12.1 96% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 14.9 55% 123 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 226GB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 15542624 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3939 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 48442728 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10767 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3092 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 30065229836 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 44 13473611811 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2608 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 41454 (C2) HDA temperature 35 56 -140737488355293 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -15002320757822 (F1) Unknown 100 253 24526992428 (F2) Unknown 100 253 35791973660	76.8% Very good	Read 140 Write 127 Mixed 128 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.25 85% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 114GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 138 3916 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3408 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3031 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 62 39 13524074534 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1779 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1628 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.7% Average	Read 88.4 Write 84.4 Mixed 83.4 64% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.39 102% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 14GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16