Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 21:24
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 223
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 430
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 81.7
48% 67.6 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 45.6
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX930 120GB-$229
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 144 155 157 158 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 281
Mixed 360
SusWrite 175
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 54.7
187% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 183
173% 269 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
SSD 360GB 360GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 166 6.9 84 58 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 510
Write 438
Mixed 360
SusWrite 98.1
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 28.6
138% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 0.2
65% 152 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
350GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 89 85 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 187
Write 71.4
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 86.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 0420 DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 76: 8R 8G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
76% 38% 74 336 269 75 27" 1920 1080 AUS27AE ASUS VP278
History: Score 36: 2R 6G 8B | Score 76: 8R 8G 12B
Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback