Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 221
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 445
59% 444 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 54.2
Parallax 45.9
42% 50.5 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 43.7
36% 43.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 30 39 120 59 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 438
Write 328
Mixed 309
SusWrite 97.5
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 18.7
57% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 44.1
47% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
306GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 168
Write 155
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 132
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 2R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 10% 105 105 2 60 21.5" 1920 1080 AOC2270 2270W
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback