Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 243
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 818
77% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
81% 104 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 101
81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 240 239 236 235 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 456
Write 425
Mixed 362
SusWrite 239
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 37.8
128% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 246
207% 301 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 113%
WD WUS721010ALE6L4 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: VXGNW980
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 238 234 234 234 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 245
Mixed 114
SusWrite 236
153% 210 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
377% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 142 143 143 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 83
SusWrite 142
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.8
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC2385 EV2436W
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback