Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime27.3 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 14:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 316
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 970
92% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,428
88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 125
49% 81.5 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 59.6
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF48 480GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TG20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 174 176 151 183 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 353
Write 217
Mixed 271
SusWrite 173
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 14
52% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 66
52% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 65%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
42GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 333 335 245 179 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 426
Write 412
Mixed 401
SusWrite 285
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 21.6
75% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 139
130% 193 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 123%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
55GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,484
Write 1,255
Mixed 1,229
294% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 86.6
287% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,343
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,281
964% 1,288 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
141GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 103 105 105 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 112
Write 89
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 107
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 24.5
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 23.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback