Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo L9600 105 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 35 1-Core 10.5 2-Core 16.4 16% 20.6 Pts	4-Core 18.8 8-Core 17.7 2% 18.2 Pts	64-Core 18.8 1% 18.8 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400M 6 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Apple(106B 00AB) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 327.2 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.25 0% 0.62 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.96 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM128 121GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: VAM0BA1Q Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3090 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3061 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 66 66 41 (B3) Unknown 94 94 207 (B4) Unknown 94 94 3697 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0	14.2% Very poor	Read 90.3 Write 31.2 Mixed 39.1 12% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 5.39 4K Mixed 4.88 30% 8.01 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.43% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo L9400IntelBench 36%, 614 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9400MNvidiaBench 1%, 6 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x