Asrock H310M-G/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H310M-G/M.2  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 11:34
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 810
77% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 129
Parallax 131
96% 126 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 122
Splatting 111
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aftershock 512GB M.2 SSD 512GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.1 360 9.6 10 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 418
Write 430
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 64.7
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 94%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
2TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 182 171 175 181 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 154
Mixed 52
SusWrite 176
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
267% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU48A32-GIISMZ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 9R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
63% 49% 39 286 210 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC17B PHL 276E9Q
History: Score 50: 6R 5G 5B | Score 63: 9R 4G 6B
Typical H310M-G/M.2 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-G/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback