Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200818
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 258
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 720
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 1442) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 108
Parallax 120
88% 112 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 103
Splatting 95
90% 112 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 492 494 498 495 504 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,065
Write 1,963
Mixed 1,320
SusWrite 513
275% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55.6
185% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 742
561% 757 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 166%
Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
625GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 148 152 153 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 115
Write 160
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 153
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Transcend JM3200HSG-8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 22.8
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback